When the Congress Plenary vote in committee or Legislative Acts there will be no conflict of interest. Nor will there be when a law is voted convening a Constituent Assembly or a referendum to amend the Constitution. If you are not convinced, visit Boy Scouts of America. (Amended by Decree 1500 of 2002) Article 183. The lawmakers, members, councilors and other popularly elected member of the corporation will lose their investiture: For violation of rules of disabilities and incompatibilities, or the regime of conflict of interest. In the absence without good cause in one regular session, six (6) plenary meetings, or the respective Constitutional Commission, which have been cited to vote draft legislation, law, ordinance, agreement, motions of censure, or election officials.
In the case of the Assemblies and Councils referred to their committees. Not to take office within eight (8) days from the date of installation of the respective corporation, or the date they were called to post ESSION. For improper of public funds. For certifiable influence peddling. For violating the rules of financing of election campaigns, to negotiate votes, or by participating in electoral transhumance practices. To conclude or execute any agreement that has been aimed at the entry to the Corporation of who should replace them, or claim as a reason to withdraw from the absolute incapacity or resignation that they prove unjustified. If the endowment lose agreements the parties involved. To manage or accept aid from public funds, anyone who had been his way of approval or implementation. CLAUSE 1o. The public offering shares or bureaucratic patronage to one or more council members or Congressmen in exchange for approval of a draft legislative act or law, ordinance or agreement shall be punished by a very serious offense that results in loss of employment.
The Greeks knew no ICH. The West/Occident evolved differently: the Egyptians (3000 BC) thought in 4 categories: the four seasons, five (the eight); That still exist in the syllogism: plus vs. minus and plus something vs. something minus the before Sokratic thought in 3 categories, such as dialectics: thesis > anti-thesis > SYN thesis; Pro vs. Contra and catalyst, not logic the Greeks thought in two categories: basic/ur thing/Tao (the way) > effect; Protagonist vs. antagonist.
Philanthropist vs. Misanthrope, Zarathustra (1000 BC) difference: bright – dark (later that day) and concluded: good – evil (moral cultures =) Aristotle (384-322 BC) then the difference: true – false (a third not there.), the natural action (ethics) = causality works after Principle of efficiency: right – wrong and we think today prefer mono causal: United States as the last big power, all-or-nothing, love it or lose it. We humans respond first emotional/ir-rational and then only rational. This logic model work as follows: our natural analogue brain responds automatically with: eye for an eye, all or nothing, how you me as I you principle of our developed digital brain reacts un aware with: whose benefits vs. harm? Is it allowed or forbidden? Civilization made this following rational logics (excerpt): not negation: neither… nor… or disjunction: either… or…
and, conjunctions, nouns, fuzzy logic:… as well as… If… then… and; Causality: If… then… because… that’s why… It developed to think – to patterns of action in following societies (excerpt): clan societies (nature, Asia) > individual / mass societies (cultures, EU/United States) I help you if you help me: > undeclared work, bribe my life against your Life > blood revenge honor, shame > civil rights (more upon request.) We first learn the our entire way of thinking (analog: feel, believe > digital: know) historically has grown! And, secondly, that the other half of humanity thinks successfully differently (analog: feel > analogue: believe). Globalization, the global analogue and digital thinking adapts quickly. Wolfgang Schwalm