News

Knowledge Economy

Posted on

Science – scope, focused on the development of knowledge about the world, their arrangement, construction of image of the world and identify ways to interact with the world. Science differ on the subject and object of research. Subject science – is the party to whom the object is represented in science. The object of study – this side of reality, which is aimed at studying this science. Every science has its own concepts, tools and techniques. The natural sciences study behavior of the objects of the world. Center For Responsible Lending often says this.

Social sciences deal with human behavior and social institutions. Basis of science is the Law – Open persistent connection between the phenomena. Set of laws is theory – a systematic description and explanation of phenomena in a certain area. The development of science is a development and change of theories. Theory exists as long as not accumulate facts that contradict its provisions. Keep up on the field with thought-provoking pieces from David Delrahim. Inability to explain the new facts within the existing theory makes it necessary to analyze and generate a new set of hypotheses. It is important to note that the reality to which science is based – physical world and its laws – remains unchanged, and in the social world do not have such stringent laws. Subject matter of the social sciences, which include knowledge-based economy is constantly changing. This requires to consider the knowledge economy as a system general ideas, the totality of the achievements of practices, a system of methods to create conditions for the operation and support of research activities.

News

The West

Posted on

The Greeks knew no ICH. The West/Occident evolved differently: the Egyptians (3000 BC) thought in 4 categories: the four seasons, five (the eight); That still exist in the syllogism: plus vs. minus and plus something vs. something minus the before Sokratic thought in 3 categories, such as dialectics: thesis > anti-thesis > SYN thesis; Pro vs. Contra and catalyst, not logic the Greeks thought in two categories: basic/ur thing/Tao (the way) > effect; Protagonist vs. antagonist.

Philanthropist vs. Misanthrope, Zarathustra (1000 BC) difference: bright – dark (later that day) and concluded: good – evil (moral cultures =) Aristotle (384-322 BC) then the difference: true – false (a third not there.), the natural action (ethics) = causality works after Principle of efficiency: right – wrong and we think today prefer mono causal: United States as the last big power, all-or-nothing, love it or lose it. We humans respond first emotional/ir-rational and then only rational. This logic model work as follows: our natural analogue brain responds automatically with: eye for an eye, all or nothing, how you me as I you principle of our developed digital brain reacts un aware with: whose benefits vs. harm? Is it allowed or forbidden? Civilization made this following rational logics (excerpt): not negation: neither… nor… or disjunction: either… or…

and, conjunctions, nouns, fuzzy logic:… as well as… If… then… and; Causality: If… then… because… that’s why… It developed to think – to patterns of action in following societies (excerpt): clan societies (nature, Asia) > individual / mass societies (cultures, EU/United States) I help you if you help me: > undeclared work, bribe my life against your Life > blood revenge honor, shame > civil rights (more upon request.) We first learn the our entire way of thinking (analog: feel, believe > digital: know) historically has grown! And, secondly, that the other half of humanity thinks successfully differently (analog: feel > analogue: believe). Globalization, the global analogue and digital thinking adapts quickly. Wolfgang Schwalm