' My reply it is not to answer to this pergunta' ' , to make another question, and that it is a protest, showing basically the relation between question and reply. The affirmation of that the questions move the world, leaves impression of a person that does not create questions nor answers, but lives of questions and other people’s answers, and as the Lobo Singer would say, them they are smart, the perfect ones, them if they find the elect ones. Who question, to the times makes another question to ask for explanation, practically ' ' they ask for manual' ' , but on behalf of the security, they read the manual, and when if purchase, the manual is one of the indispensable item. Boy Scouts of America takes a slightly different approach. On behalf of that they answer, I would make alegrico car call world, where the ones that pushes the car, have in its shirts a interrogation in the coasts. I remember some words of Russian Renato: more so certain how much the error of being boat to the engine, and the salute lives is not there because we do not see. Our God and Father are the Glory for all always. Amen. FILIPENSES 4.20
According to Demon (2000, P. 109) ' ' the dialectic if relates to the historicidade of the society and natureza' '. History not only express the evolution and social contradiction, but contains in itself the explanation of the phenomenon, leaving of the estimated one that history if does not dilute it is constructed in the base of the conflicts, is these complementary contrary or. The nucleus of a historical transformation partner inhabits as embryo, is generated and conceived in the proper cradle of History. Source: PCRM. 2.6.3Dialtica the arguments of the dialectic if divide in three parts: thesis, antithesis and synthesis. The nucleus of the dialectic is the shock and ' ' inquiry of the contradictions of the reality …
considered the science of the general laws of the movement of the world exterior and of the conscience humana' ' (RICHARDSON, 2008 P. 45-46). The dynamics of the dialtico thought follows principles laws and categories. A priori we will explore the principles and laws. They are the two basic principles of the dialectic: ) Principle of the Universal Connection: the phenomena and objects linked and are called mutually. b) Principle of the Permanent Movement: everything is in movement. These principles if bind the laws of the dialectic: they are these: – Law of the unit and Fight of the contrary: we can elucidate citing a previous example of the polarization of magnets, where the polar regions are at the same time opposing and complementary. – Law of the transformation of the amount in quality: impossible to modify the quality of an object or phenomenon without quantitative alteration.
– Law of the Negation of the Negation: substitution of the old one for the new. We can use of examples in the understanding of these laws and interaction. Richardson (2008) demonstrates the principles above comparing it the development the Wheat: wheat grain is denied and in its place the plant is born, the plant is denied and in its place the spike is born.
These citizens to if coming across with requirements of the work market and being without conditions of qualification and preparations had lost the perspectives of professional accomplishment, starting to constantly change of activities and places and to constitute a significant contingent. According to Cleisa, It goes dislocating for different activities and different places, alternating work and unemployment. This diversity segmentation hinders the creation of steady bonds with the work, the family, the places. Its life is always recommencing. Almost nothing it is permanent, not to be the daily search of the survival, what it becomes its fragmented life extremely. (CLEISA, 2005:36) Without corresponding the current necessities of the market, they enter in the accumulation of the informal work that grows to each day and if it closes in the competitiveness diminishing for many the possibility of autonomy and survival.
Without conditions this worker is the grace of the palliative supports. This group represents an image depressing and also suffocated for the high index of unemployment that devastates the country. To write on life in the streets allowed the Cleisa to explain the importance of if understanding this demand in the national context and mentioning the weakness of and the directed public politics to the treatment of the question. To speak of the population of Street in Brazil, today, is to also speak of historical delay, indifference, inefficiency and even though absence of politics you publish and of rights of empobrecidos and oppressed sectors of the Brazilian society. One evidences that, with the crisis of the State, its parcel of responsibility comes if reducing.
This makes among others that it has broken of the social matter pass to be faced by the civil society, by means of the not governmental organizations and foundations. (CLEISA, 2005:38). The studies on street population show these citizens liveing in the streets and sleeping in the squares, marquees of store, in low of bridges, among others. They belong to a diversified population picture that increases and if it quickly modifies due its fragile mobility. With proper forms of living they make of the life in the street a very fragile linking, belonging to the space of the street is very vacant, does not have definite place as housing, only as control point. The place if modifies in the measure where they also leave in the search security for the rest and for the feeding and the hygienic cleaning. Many finish installing itself in the streets of another city due to the attempts frustrated in obtaining a job. Of this form, mobility for the search in the search of accomplishment in the perspective to keep a work extremely accepting precarious conditions to guarantee the sustenance of the family loses the reason