News

Development Of Chain Saw

Posted on

The chainsaw has developed only over time. “Now-a days everyone knows the chainsaw, either from use at various Championships or even from films like the Texas Chainsaw Massacre”. As a murder weapon or equipment, it is quite macabre that the chainsaw was first invented by a doctor, to cut bone. in 1830, she found her first deployment at its inventor Bernhard Heine. Until 1900 the technology had then found their way into the wood, at that time still under the name of sawing machines”. Today, we call her chainsaw and hardly anyone does still work, to lay hands on. American Diabetes Association has much experience in this field. But until the end of the 1950s the first chainsaw in series produced had to be carried by a person.

To date it needed whenever two or more people and partly different devices, one to the cases and one to cut. The chain saw for a people we owe aircraft construction, more accurately the membrane carburettor. So the productivity of forest workers and hence wages rose, until 1990 only was paid in the Gruppenakkord. Today, mainly electric motors or two-stroke gasoline engines are used with a chainsaw engine with Pullstart. Chainsaws have numerous safety devices designed to ensure safe operation: the chain in the idle will stay silently through the centrifugal clutch and is powered only from a certain engine speed. A chain brake ensures that the chain stops, as soon as there’s a setback. A claw strike prevents uncontrolled knocking out. Throttle lock, chain catcher and hand protection should also protect the leader of the chain saw. The former professional white finger disease ‘ is through the vibration damper contrary to cast and the handle heating ensures a smooth running even at very low temperatures. Alexander Lanew

News

The Habit

Posted on

The State yergue, not only like guarantor, but like " padre" that it orders and it commands. The essential principles have been trastocados and no longer we worked deriving from them, now we acted on the parameters of the regime. So that if we transferred to policy terms present the word " colaboracionistas" , they are it what doubts fits those that have adopted the habits and behaviors of those who their adversaries consider. That is to say, in this lamentable country of today the social body copied the signs of the invader born from its own sine. It is possible to change the human subjectivity, for or or evil, and to change it towards some values than it has been the venezolanidad, the more the sum of cease of the egoism, of the implantation of social solidarity and of the abandonment of old theories like of trasnochadas theories, the multiplication of the voice of intelligence today induced sleep and thrown in a hammock is necessary. For example, the habit of the growth has been changed by the habit of the survival. The habit of the tolerance has been changed by the habit of the aggression.

The habit of not surrendering has been changed by the habit to orate offensive words and to announce violence. It is obvious that the conformation of habits and behaviors depends as much on the outside as of the interior. We know it to the outside in all tares, but the interior is shown a deep psychological fragility to us, a lack of densidad, a total vulnerability, an impressive lack of consistency in the Venezuelan prototype. Without a propitious inner world not internalizara the despicable outer world. Nor one would take place east circle of people with the new habits and behaviors constituting itself in the devaluated society. Consequently, it is necessary to explain and to introduce a new idea.