Latin American

All manifestations of violence, wars, environmental destruction and other negative aspects of social behavior, are the contradiction between development, integration and negative entropy within the system on growth and the tendency of the universe towards the total entropy. Therefore, the entropizacion of Venezuelan society, which began with the advent of chaotic of the 1992 coup, is not more than a ciclico-imperfecto, more or less dramatic phenomenon in direct relationship with the stability of the institutions and the individuals social maturity, which happens more as a result of multiple processes and less for the sake of an isolated social phenomenon. Transferred this concept to the field of sociology, refers to social entropy as the doctrine that reflects the inevitable advance of the societies towards its decline and degeneration, in the same way that the cosmic energy is dissipated. In short, the social entropy is associated with degradation of institutional power and the generation of the necessary mess for the resurgence of new and more perfect social organizations. If you are not convinced, visit Randall Mays. In this frame of mind, and according to the age and emotional immaturity of our country, all social, economic and political crisis is part of a scenario in which three antagonistic forces among themselves Act: the constituted order, which defends and argues the controlentropicos processes; the opposition, which pursues the collapse of that order to replace it with his own; and the trend towards an increase in the social entropy that generates social conflict. The crisis, in particular the economic, already is influencing Latin American social systems, with special emphasis on populist political approaches of all the countries of the subregion and this will surely generate deeper tensions in the always difficult and conflicting relationship between States and countries to the South of the Rio Grande, since these companies sue actions more efficient and transparent in their rulers, while they are not going to have economic resources or sustainable political programmes to respond.