Meanwhile it is gone braking the human progress where it is more necessary: in the knowledge and the understanding of itself exactly, as well as Scrates defended. It is dispensable to discourse on the reasons of the convenience of the ignorance, today, travestida of necessity and popular wisdom. Perversely it is there that this interest but goes to justify itself. However, the popular wisdom always was unequivocal, practical, clear e, under some aspects, graciously descomplicada. Vide phrases of truck for-shock. As much that the term of Latin origin, ' ' pago' ' , it comes of ' ' paganum' ' that it means village. The European villagers (peoples of the forest) were infensos to the process of civilization under the Christian urban guardianship. For other opinions and approaches, find out what Brooke Harlow has to say. Exactly after the victory of the religious civilization, many practical popular considered undesirable or you disapproved, for the Church, had persisted in history.
As the abortion, for example. The industry of the naivety always was prosperous, prestigious with its defenders and rigorous with its adversaries. To preserve the ignorance it is basic. As by-product of a genetic manipulation it is not difficult to the Man to conclude that the technology is the tip of the spear of its true divine inheritance. It comes drawing out the life human being, deciphering its codes, bringing more comfort and creating solutions so that the negative balance of these conquests if incorporates the learning. Not as son of the creator of the universe nor as son ' ' of that one ' ' , the Man placed a foot in the Age of the Communications and not yet he concluded the first step. It is what it he was possible and was not little. The societies of the Age of the Communications will be very different of those where ideology of the belief prepondered. One is turning a page the history of the Humanity. The genetic code of the faith also has of being deciphered, making with that this valuable psychological resource is disponibilizado with more seriousness in the next future, emptying the exclusivismo and the aggressiveness of the tribal mentality still today fed by the ideology of the belief.
It is possible to transform the systems of energy of the world? It could be realised in two decades? The answers depend on the chosen technologies, the availability of materials critics and of economic and political factors. Only clean technologies the renewable energies come from seductive sources: wind, that also produces waves; water, that includes geothermal the hydroelectric energy, tides and (water warmed up by hot rocks); sun, that includes photovoltaic energy and the thermoelectrial lot that focuses the light of the sun to warm up a fluid that drives a turbine to generate electricity. Our plan at the moment includes only the technologies in operation or that are close today of the production in great scale, instead of which they can need 20 or 30 years preparation as of today. In order to make sure that our power system would remain clean, we considered only the technologies that throughout have almost zero gas discharges of greenhouse effect and polluting agents atmospherics their service life, including the construction, operation and dismantling. For example, when they are burned in the vehicles, the majority of the ecological ethanol sources even creates airborne contamination that causes the same level of mortality that when burning fire gasoline.
The nuclear power produces up to 25 times more of carbon dioxide emissions that the Aeolian energy, when the construction and the enrichment of the uranium Y its transport are considered. The carbon capture and its technology of kidnapping can reduce the dioxide emissions carbon of the thermal power plants, but it will increase the emission of polluting substances of the air and it will extend to all the other injurious effects of the mining, transports and processing of the coal, because it must use more coal to take care of the demand energetics of the stages of capture and storage. Also, we considered only the technologies that do not present/display elimination of residues or risks of being used by the terrorism.
Everyone can be greener. There are so many things we can all do to make the world a better place; to clean-up the environment and to save the planet. It is therefore essential that we teach our kids how to do this from as young an age as possible.
So here are a few ways for us to teach our kids about being greener:
1. Recycling: If your kid does a drawing, make sure they use both sides. Once they’re done with it (they’ve put it up or shown you, etc.), they should put it in the recycling bin.
2. Travel: Encourage your kids to walk or cycle as much as possible. Try to use the car as little as possible so that they learn from your actions.
3. Water: Install a water filter and buy your children BPA-free water bottles so that your kids don’t need to be buying bottled water from the stores to be thrown away.
4. Books: Use the library; try to avoid buying books. When that’s not possible, encourage your kids to do book swaps with other kids.
5. Clothing: Encourage your children to go through their clothing before winter and summer and sort out what they will and won’t wear in the future. With whatever remains, take them to a charity store to donate.
Ultimately, when our kids learn how to be eco-friendly, America and the world at large has a better chance of survival, step-by-step.