CHARITY the charity In its simplicity In its ephemeral amplitude In its singeleza and goodness. The charity takes in them to be kinder takes in them to divide. It raises us spiritual. It teaches to divide it to us and to understand the other people’s suffering. It shows to us that to our pains and sufferings that are small ahead of the sufferings of our brothers. Ours it teaches to be benevolent. Dr. Neal Barnard may also support this cause. It teaches to understand it to us.
It teaches to help it to us. Charity in itself and one of the greaters of all the teachings that the father left in them. The charity assists in them in our day. The charity I obtain exactly and with the other brothers. The charity approaches in them to the unfastened love. The charity that God says in them is the charity where we divide what we do not have and not what in the surplus, we divide: Understanding the love the pardon the patience and agreement the learning the charity moves away in them from the terrenas viciaes, it in the felt sample the true one of the existence. in the sample that God is caridoso.
The charity and in its most benevolent and pacifying essence to all. The charity and a chance that God gave in them. To move. To fix. To love. It stops to feel. To fortify. To scatter to all. Generous and benign the charity is a blessing and peace. That this charity in them approaches each time more than we ourselves and that let us can annul our hurts, and that let us can see the amplitude of its existence and its largeness. The charity and the harmony spiritual, serenity and love in our hearts. That the father continues in blessing and fortifying and that continues intuindo these brothers of light so that can in them bring this blessing and light and peace. That thus he is.
Conflict My dear brothers, who the peace of God is always with you. My brothers if suffer the dilacerao from the soul, if he distresses if he suffers and he cries. If today you live in conflicts. They pursue if you. They humiliate if you. They calumniate if you they wound If you. They make if you to feel that you are not loved.
If everything that you make you are welcome has value. If it feels you alone. Aflito. Overwhelming. If you complain of and you cry. If your fights and pains, are not seen by your brothers. These conflicts These tears These pains.
It is a premise. It is an day for the evolution, and an arduous and austere way. It is the road of the knowledge Is the school of the indulgence and the pardon. It is the ascent for the agreement For the light. These afflictions nothing more are. Of what knowing. We harvest what we plant That we redeem in them of our errors. That we come back toward corrigiz them. If to suffer diverse pains, is because we spread thus it in another existence. We have you parents and incompressible mothers Are because thus already we have a carrying son of diseases is because yesterday We take somebody to commit the suicide, They have a husband or conturbada and sick wife, in them to demand us it infatigvel tolerance is because we abandon yesterday it. Everything that we pass here. Everything what we suffer here is the consequence of what we live yesterday, pains that we sow yesterday. We today harvest, the tears that we spill today Is what yesterday we made to fall the calumnies and hatred for spread us Let us receive today. By in such a way my dear brothers nobody is punished Nobody is Pursued victim of an injustice Damaged Nobody is victim and yes we are what we plant yesterday We are those that yesterday we cause pains and sufferings For we do not understand what the pardon is the love, the charity, the patience, the austerity, Humildade At last if today we pass for conflicts inside and outside of our homes is because yesterday we cause and all the cause and a reaction.
The necessity to breathe in the atmosphere would have made to appear pulmes in the fish that had started to pass small periods are d' water, what it would have allowed its descendants to live in land more time, fortifying the pulmes for the exercise; the gills, each time less used by the pulmonados fish, had finished for disappearing. Thus, the mechanism of formation of a new species would be, in general lines, the following one: some individuals of an ancestral species started to live in a different environment; the new environment created necessities that before did not exist, which the organism satisfied developing new hereditary characteristics; the carriers of these characteristics started to form a new species, different of the first one. The doctrine of Lamarck was published in Philosophie zoologique (1809; Philosophy zoological), and had, as main merit, to excite debates and research in a field that, until then, was exclusive domain of the philosophy and the religion. Posterior studies had demonstrated that, only the first postulate of the lamarckismo, was correct; in fact, the environment provokes in the individual adaptativas modifications; but the thus acquired characters do not transmit the offspring. In 1859, Charles Darwin published The Origin of Species (the origin of the species), book of great impact in the scientific way that put in evidence the paper of the natural election in the mechanism of the evolution.
Darwin broke of the comment which according to, inside from a species, the individuals differs ones of the others. It has, therefore, in the fight for the existence, a competition between individuals of diverse capacities. Most adapted they are the ones that leave bigger number of descendants. The darwinismo was basically correct, but it had of being complemented e, in some aspects, corrected for the evolucionistas of century XX so that if it transformed into the solid evolucionista doctrine of today.
A window for which the people see the life. The foundation of all the espiritualidade is the word of God. To practise the good. To love itself. The Espiritismo, in turn, cannot be defined simply as a religion.
It is a Philosophical Doctrine, sidewalk in scientific base of religious consequence. It was codified by? Allan Kardek? as esprita doctrine. The Espiritismo is not these things that if someone practises in the house of the owner, of ' ' me' ' ciclana or of ' ' pai' ' beltrano, although these people to make question to call its practical as being espritas. The Espiritismo is a Doctrine based on the teachings of Jesus (the biggest example of coherence and Love of which the world already had knowledge), that respects the freedom of the people, that does not curtail the freedom to think of nobody, that does not point finger with respect to nobody, that does not judge and it does not say to be exclusive owner of the truth. Its conception of God is total different of the conventional: God is sovereign good, just, merciful and the inferiority cannot be leveled human being. The Justice of God cannot be compared with the justice of the men, therefore the Esprita logic admits that ' ' God does not punish and he does not pardon ningum' ' , since, to punish it would be being intolerante with the imperfections of ' ' crianas' ' delayed ignorants and; to pardon, he would imply that he had been offended before. To admit offended God is something that opposes the sense well. Religiosidade differs from, that is any set of beliefs, norms and values that compose article of faith of definitive person, which is seen by us as the attempt human being of religar its origins, its past, its creator, is the exteriorizao of its faith.
Detaching still the contribution of Pablo in the opening of new evangelsticos works and the importance of the structure of small groups as an exit in times of unscrupulous persecution on the part of the Roman Empire, in a period of almost two centuries and way. It demonstrates the historical contribution of the peoples Roman, Greek and Jewish, preparing all an environment for sprouting of the Christianity, studying the principles that had guided the foundation of the Primitive Church, from the first century d.C., its founders, its fenomenal growth through history, the persecutions who had occurred to it, as well as the relation of that church with the church of the gift, taking itself in consideration the historical, cultural and social context of both the times. Word-Key: Primitive church? Pablo? Evangelismo? Small Groups? Persecution? Growth. INTRODUCTION Ahead of some theological fidgets concerning the work of evanglicas churches having as base the small groups, we will present a study on the formation of the call Primitive Church, from the first century d.C., relating it with the church of the gift.
Searching to identify what it caused the beginning of the meetings of the first small groups, one intends to understand the principles of formation of this church and the relevance of these meetings for that time, as well as in the present time. The present objective production to clarify to who can interest the basic sprouting, principles, the founders, the causes, the persecutions and the relevance of the Primitive Church in history. For this, the historical method by means of the research is used bibliographical.